Nearly 50% of people worldwide will experience a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) in their lifetime. Some may even experience a TBI, like a concussion, without knowing it, which can come with long-term effects.
Self-report questionnaires are available for patients to describe their symptoms after a head injury, but there's a pressing need for objective cognitive measures to get a clear and immediate picture of brain function so that providers can make timely and appropriate referrals as needed. This need is especially critical in concussion diagnosis, to ensure patients receive the right care at the right time.
Providers wanting to accurately and efficiently screen patients may be asking: What tools can they use to test for a concussion? In this article, we’ll walk through the different kinds of tools available to accurately and confidently assess patients for a concussion, as well as how and when to use them.
Concussions may result from a variety of incidents, like car accidents, sports injuries, falls, and anything else that causes a hit to the head or a sudden jolt. With multiple mechanisms of potential injury, it’s important to know when to test for a concussion. So, when should concussion testing be used?
Concussion assessment tools are designed to measure a variety of symptoms, including:
Objective cognitive tests are particularly useful to integrate into concussion assessment, as they can be difficult for a patient to accurately evaluate their own memory and reasoning skills using only subjective self-report measures. Digital cognitive tests can objectively measure how a patient’s concussion symptoms affect them and their ability to function in daily life.
Broadly, there are two main types of concussion assessments used in a clinical consultation: subjective and objective. This section describes a number of examples for each.
With so many options, clinicians might be asking: What is the best concussion assessment tool? The answer is: A combination of objective and subjective cognitive performance tests is ideal, along with physiological tests and clinician assessment. An absence of one or the other could result in incomplete information, so it’s a good idea to use a range of tests that assess multiple facets of cognitive, mental, psychological, and physical health to inform a whole-person care approach to healthcare.
Subjective concussion evaluation tools typically involve a questionnaire or a symptom checklist for patients to self-report their symptoms. These symptoms can vary from person to person, so it’s important to interpret results in the context of each individual patient. Having a personalized approach to a patient and healthcare is especially important when it comes to brain health.
These tools are invaluable for screening, but are not always substantial enough for a full concussion diagnosis on their own, and may leave clinicians wondering: When do they need to refer to a specialist for a concussion?
Using only subjective self-report evaluations often requires clinicians to refer to a specialist in order to fully evaluate the needs and treatment care plan of a patient who has experienced a head trauma. However, using subjective tests together with objective tests can lead to a more complete and accurate picture of brain health, post-injury.
Objective concussion assessments include cognitive performance tools that test brain function. These tasks are designed to quantitatively assess various cognitive skills related to post-concussion syndrome, like memory, attention, processing speed, executive function, and language skills.
Creyos offers a variety of online cognitive tasks that are scientifically validated and backed by 30 years of research. These tasks can be performed by patients in a clinic or at home and do not require the presence of a healthcare professional or trained administrator. For example:
Cognitive deficits related to a brain injury can depend on the nature, severity, location, and time passed since the injury, as well as other factors. A comprehensive assessment of several domains of cognition allows for greater test sensitivity and an increased likelihood that the assessment can effectively detect impairment when it is present after a concussion. Long-term effects tend to be more subtle, but can persist. For example, people who report a history of at least one concussion tend to score lower on Double Trouble.
Screening: There are some tests designed specifically for on-site or emergency room assessment. Perhaps one of the most common is the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) screening tool. It takes about 5 minutes to complete and is designed to be used immediately after a suspected concussion. This brief assessment doesn’t require a specialist to interpret the test scores, but it has inadequate sensitivity and therefore isn’t a good stand-alone test.
Diagnosis: Neurologists or other trained medical professionals will likely perform a variety of tests and assessments in order to diagnose a concussion. Such assessment may include testing and evaluating a patient’s symptoms, balance, cognitive ability, etc., before beginning a treatment plan.
Regular testing: Assessment tools can be used regularly to monitor symptoms over time and to assess the effectiveness of a treatment plan. Cognitive tasks are particularly useful for repeated testing at regular follow-up. A case study on the Kerlan-Jobe Center for Sports Neurology found that using Creyos cognitive assessments in the clinic led to 10% fewer referrals and an increase in patient retention.
Return to regular activities: For sports injuries in particular, while exercise can have a positive effect on brain health, it may be recommended for athletes to delay return to play until they are no longer experiencing concussion symptoms and have been cleared by their healthcare team. Similarly, a patient’s healthcare team will determine when and how it’s best for them to return to work, school, or certain leisure activities like video gaming.
A concussion test can measure the:
Each test is scored differently, so it’s important to have an understanding of what to look for when interpreting the results of each assessment. For example, the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, or RPQ, is a self-report questionnaire that includes a series of questions related to post-concussion symptoms experienced in the last 24 hours, such as physical, cognitive, emotional, sensory, and sleep-related impairments. The RPQ can be paired with additional questionnaires and cognitive tasks to get a more objective picture of brain health.
The RPQ and other concussion evaluation tools may indicate a suspected concussion, but should never be interpreted in isolation. Results should be taken together along with the findings of other tests, assessments, and interviews. Working with other members of the patient’s healthcare team for continuity of care has been shown to have a positive impact on the patient’s overall health.
In this article, we’ve given a brief overview of some concussion assessments and their purpose. We’ve described several available concussion assessment tools, with a focus on subjective and objective measurements.
Patients can present with a variety of symptoms and effects after a concussion. Because of this, it’s important to consider a range of tests when evaluating a patient. Ideally, multiple assessments paired together may provide a more comprehensive picture of patient health.
It is also likely recommended that these assessments be taken by the patient multiple times over the course of recovery from a TBI. This can help the healthcare provider determine how the patient’s symptoms are changing and how effective a given treatment plan is.
Mike Battista specializes in brain health, cognition, and neuropsychological testing. He received his PhD in personality and measurement psychology at Western University in 2010 and has been doing fun and useful stuff in the intersection between science and technology ever since.